[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit ::
:: Volume 24, Issue 2 (4-2012) ::
J Islam Dent Assoc Iran 2012, 24(2): 54-59 Back to browse issues page
Comparison of Obturation Density Using Nickel Titanium and Stainless Steel Spreaders by Lateral Compaction Technique
Mohsen Hasheminia1, Behnaz Barekatain *2, Ali Akhavan3, Somayeh Vaziri4
1- Associate Professor, Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Isfahan, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Isfahan, Iran , Barekatain@dnt.mui.ac.ir
3- Endodontist
4- Dentist
Abstract:   (9083 Views)
   Background and Aim : The density of Gutta-percha is an important factor in canal seal and root canal treatment success. So, the present study intended to compare the effect of Ni-Ti and S-S spreaders on the intracanal Gutta-percha weight .

 Materials and Methods : In this experimental study, 40 simulated canals with 40 degree curvature (group 1 and 2) and 40 simulated canals with 10 degree curves (group 3 and 4) were used. Each block was weighted after cleaning and shaping using Flexmaster rotary instruments. Group 1 and 3 blocks were obturated using Ni-Ti spreaders, while group 2 and 4 blocks were obturated using stainless steel spreaders with Gutta-percha. The simulated canals were again weighted and the difference of the two measurements was calculated as the Gutta-percha weight. The results were analyzed using SPSS software and 2-way ANOVA tests .

 Results : The analysis showed that there was no significant difference between the four experimental groups. In addition, the effect of the canal curvature, spreader type and the interaction of the variables was not statistically significant

 Conclusion : The current study showed that different spreader types (Ni-Ti or S-S) do not affect the Gutta-percha weight of the root canal obturation .

Keywords: Gutta percha, Density, Canal obturation, Lateral compaction technique, Stainless steel, Spreader, Nickel-titanium spreader
Full-Text [PDF 154 kb]   (1440 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Orginal | Subject: Endodentics
References
1. Schider H. Filling root canals in three dimen-sions. J Endod. 2006 Apr; 32(4):281-90.
2. Walton R, TorabinejadM. Principles and prac-tice of endodontics. 4thed, Saunders, Philadel-phia 2009; 30:306.
3. Hugh CL, Walton RE, Facer SR. Evaluation of intracanal sealer distribution with five differ-ent obturation techniques. Quint Int 2005Oct;36(9): 721-9.
4. Marlin J, Schilder H. Physical properties of gutta-percha. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1973 Dec; 36(6):872-9.
5. Cailleteau JG, Mullaney TP. Prevalence of teaching apical patency and obturation tech-niques in United States dental Schools. J Endod. 1997 Jun; 23(6):394-6.
6. Sakkal S, Weine F, Lemian L. lateral Conden-sation inside view. Compendium 1991 Nov; 12(11):796-800.
7. Peters DD. Two-year in vitro solubility evalu-ation of four gutta-percha sealer obturation techniques. J Endod. 1986 Apr; 12(4):139-45.
8. Dang DA, Walton RE. Vertical Root fracture and root distortion: effect of spreader design. J Endod. 1989 Jul; 15(7):294-301.
9. Schmidt KJ, Walker TL, Johnson JD, Nicoll BK. comparison of nickel-titanium and stain-less-steel spreader penetration and accessory cone fit in curved canals. J Endod. 2000 Jan; 26(1):42-4.
10. Walia H, Brantley WA, Gerstein H. An ini-tial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitional root files. J Endod. 1988 Jul; 14(7):346-51.
11. Berry KA, Loushine RJ, Primack PD, Runyan DA. Nickel titanium versus stainless steel finger spreaders in curved canals. J Endod. 1998 Nov; 24(11):752-54.
12. Sobhi MB, Khan I. Penetration depth of nickel titanium and stainless steel finger spread-ers in curved root canals. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2003 Feb; 13(2):70-72.
13. Gharai SR, Thrope JR, Strother JM, McClanahan SB. Comparison of generated forces and apical microleakage using nickel-titanium and stainless steel finger spreaders in curved canals. J Endod. 2005 Mar; 31(3):198-200.
14. Xia ZM, Peng B, Bian Z, Fan MW. Compari-son of penetration and obturation density using nickel titanium and stainless steel spreaders in curved canals. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi XueZaZhi. 2006 Oct; 24(5):429-31.
15. Sadeghi SH, Haji SadeghiH.Density and api-cal sealing ability of lateral compaction using two different spreaders and vertical compaction using Beefill device. In Endod J. 2009 Winter; (4):10-14.
16. Grossman LI. Endodontic practice, 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lea &Febiger, 1965:337-8.
17. Schilder H, Goodman A, Aldrich W. The thermomechanical properties of gutta-percha. I. The compressibility of gutta-percha. J Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1974 Jun; 37(6):946-53.
18. Gound TG, Reihm RJ, Odgaard EC, Mak-kawy H. Effect of spreader and accessory cone size on density of obturation using conventional or mechanical lateral condensation. J Endod. 2001 May; 27(5):358-61.
19. Baumgardner KR, Krell KV. Ultrasonic condensation of guttapercha: an in-vitro dye penetration and scanning electron microscopic study. J Endod. 1990 Jun; 16(6):253-9.
20. Moreno A. Thermomechanically softened guttapercha root canal filling. J Endod. 1977 May; 3(5):186-8.
21. Allison AA, Michelich RJ, Walton RE. The influence of master cone adaptation on the quality of the apical seal. J Endod. 1981 Feb; 7(2):61-5.
22. Allison DA, Weber CR, Walton RE. The in-fluence of the method of canal preparation on the quality of apical and coronal obturation. J Endod. 1979 Oct; 5(10):298-304.
23. Wilson BL, Baumgartner JC.Comparison of spreader penetration and obturation density dur-ing lateral compaction of 0.04 and 0.02 tapered master cones. J Endod. 2003 Dec;29(12):828-31.
24. Lopes HP, Neves MA, Elias CN, Moreira EJ, SiqueiraJ.Comparison of some physical proper-ties of finger spreaders made of stainless steel or nickel-titanium alloys. Clin Oral Investig. 2010 Jun 29.
25. Simons J, Ibanez B, Friedman S, Trope M. Leakage after lateral condensation with finger spreaders and D-11-T spreaders. J Endod. 1991Mar; 17(3):101-4.
26. Mann SR, McWalter GM. Evaluation of api-cal seal and placement control of in straight ca-nals obturated by laterally condensed and ther-moplastisized gutta-percha. J Endod. 1987 Jun; 13(1):10-17.
27. Hopkins JH, Remeikis NA, Van Cura JE. McSpadden versus lateral condensation of gut-tapercha: The extent of apical microleakage. J Endod. 1986 May; 12(5):198-201.
28. Johnson WT, Zakariasen KL. Spectropho-tometric analysis of microleakage in the fine curved canals found in the mesial roots of mandibular molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1983 Sept; 56(3):305-9.
29. Holcomb J, Pitts D, Nicholls J.Further inves-tigation of spreader loads required to cause ver-tical root fracture during lateral condensation. J Endod. 1987 Jun; 13(6):277-84.
30. Leiwehr FR, Kulild JC, Primack PD. Im-proved density of gutta-percha after warm lat-eral condensation. J Endod. 1993 Oct; 19(10):489-91.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA code


XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Hasheminia M, Barekatain B, Akhavan A, Vaziri S. Comparison of Obturation Density Using Nickel Titanium and Stainless Steel Spreaders by Lateral Compaction Technique. J Islam Dent Assoc Iran. 2012; 24 (2) :54-59
URL: http://jidai.ir/article-1-1203-en.html


Volume 24, Issue 2 (4-2012) Back to browse issues page
Journal of Islamic Dental Association of Iran

AWT IMAGE

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 32 queries by YEKTAWEB 3877