[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit ::
:: Volume 25, Issue 4 (10-2013) ::
J Islam Dent Assoc Iran 2013, 25(4): 272-277 Back to browse issues page
The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Time on Microleakage of Composite Restorations
Parvin Mirzakoucheki Boroujeni 1, Mehrdad Barekatain2, Parisa Fattahi3, Atefeh Fatemi4, Laiya Zahraei4, Ala Sharafi4, Farid Fazeli4
1- Assistant Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Islamic Azad University, Khorasgan Branch. Esfahan, Iran , cosmeticmir@yahoo.com
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Islamic Azad University, Khorasgan Branch. Esfahan, Iran
3- Resident, Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Islamic Azad University, Khorasgan Branch. Esfahan, Iran
4- Dentist
Abstract:   (9010 Views)

  Background and Aim : Composite resins require time to complete their polymerization. This process usually reaches its maximum rate after 24 hours. On the other hand, immediately after restoration, water sorption results in hygroscopic expansion of composite resins and the mentioned two factors usually reachequilibrium after a week. Considering the effect of mentioned processes on the microleakage of composite restorations, the purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of finishing and polishing time on the mean microleakage of composite restorations .

  Materials and Methods : In this in-vitro experimental study, 60 sound human premolar teeth were selected. A standard Class V cavity was prepared measuring 1.5 mm in depth, 3 mm in width and 2 mm in length on the buccal surface of each tooth and incrementally restored with composite resin. Next, the teeth were randomly divided into 4 groups. The teeth in groups 1, 2, 3 and 4 were finished and polished immediately, 15 min, 24 h and one week after storage in distilled water at 37°C, respectively. Specimens in each group were subjected to 500 thermal cycles. The teeth were then coated with adhesive wax and nail varnish and immersed in 2% fuchsin solution for 24h. The specimens were washed and each sample was longitudinally sectioned in half by a diamond saw. Both halves were evaluated in terms of dye penetration under a stereomicroscope at 28X magnification. For each sample, the section with greater degree of microleakage was selected. Kruskal Wallis test and Mann Whitney U test were used for data analysis with a 99.1% confidence interval .

  Results : The lowest mean microleakage was observed in the occlusal margin of group 3 teeth while the highest mean microleakage belonged to the occlusal and gingival margins of teeth in group 2. A significant difference was noted between the 4 groups in occlusal margin microleakage (P<0.009). However, no such difference was found in gingival margin .

  Conclusion: This study showed that the finishing and polishing timewas effective on the mean microleakage in the enamel margin of composite restorations. The best time of finishing and polishing was 24h after the restoration. Time of finishing and polishing had no effect on microleakage in dentin margins of restorations .

Keywords: Composite resins, polishing, microleakage
Full-Text [PDF 170 kb]   (1480 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Orginal | Subject: Restorative Dentistry
References
1. Yap AU, Wong ML, Lim AC. The effect of pol-ishing systems on microleakage of tooth-coloured restoraties: Part2 Composite and Poly-acid- modified composite resins. J Oral Rehabil. 2000 Mar; 27(3):205-10.
2. Kidd EA. Microleakage: A review. J Dent. 1976 Sept; 4(5):199-206.
3. Jefferies SR. The art and science of abrasive finishing and polishing in restorative dentistry. Dent Clin of North Am. 1998 Oct; 42(4):613-627.
4. Yu XY, Wieczkowski G, Davis E. The influ-ence of finishing technique on microleakage. J Esthet Dent. 1990 Sept-Oct;2(5):142-4.
5. Dodge WW, Dale RA, Cooley RL, Duke ES. Comparison of wet and dry finishing of resin composites with aluminium oxide discs. J Dent Mater. 1991 Jan; 7(1):18-20.
6. Helvatjoglou–Antoniadi M, Papadogianis Y, koliniotou kubia E, Kubias S. Surface hardness of light-cured and self –cured composite resins. J Prosth Dent. 1991 Feb;65(2):215-220.
7. Rapisarda E, Bonaccorso A, Tripi TR, Torrisi l. Comparision of different finishing methods for composites and compomers. Orofilometric analysis. J Minerva Stomatol. 1999 May; 48(5):181-9.
8. Asmussen E, & Jorgensen KD. A microscopic investigation of the adaptation of some plastic filling materials to dental Cavity wall. Acta Odontol Scand. 1972 Mar; 30(1):3-21.
9. Lopes Gc, Franke M, Maia HP. Effect of finish-ing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Jul;88(1):32-36.
10. Venturini D, Cenci MS, Demarco FF, Camacho GB, Powers JM. Effect of polishing techniques and time on surface roughness and micro leak-age of resin composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2006 Jan-Feb; 31(1):11-17.
11. Yap AU, YEo EJ, Yap WY, Ong DS, Tan JW. Effects of instrumentation time on microleakage of resin modified glass ionomer cements. Oper Dent. 2003 Jan-Feb;28(1):47-52.
12. Powers JM, Sakaguchi RL, Craigs. Restorative dental materials.12th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2006, 236-40.
13. Maresca C, Pimenta LA, Heymann HO, Ziem-iercki TL, Ritter AV. Effect of finishing instru-ment on the marginal integrity of resin–based composite restoration. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2010 Apri;22(2):104-12.
14. Roberson TM, Heyman HO, Swift EJ. Stru-derant,s Art and science of operative dentistry. 5th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2006, 198-201, 476-479.
15. Yazici AR, Ozgunaltay G, Deyangac B. The effect of different types of flowable restoration resin composite on microleakage in class V cav-ities. J Oper Dent. 2003 Nov-Dec;28(6):773-8.
16. Yap AU, Tan S, The TY. The effect o polishing sys-tem on microleakage of coloured restoratives; part 1, conventional and resin modified glass ionomer ce-ments. J Oral Rehabil. 2000 Feb; 27(2):117-23.
17. Yalçin F, Korkmaz Y, Başeren M. The effect of two different polishing techniques on microle-akage of new composites in Class V restora-tions. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006 Nov; 1;7(5):18-25.
18. Cenci MS, Venturini D, Pereira-Cenci T, Piva E, Demarco FF. The Effect of Polishing techniques and time on the surface characteristics and seal-ing ability of resin composite restorations after one-year storage. Oper Dent. 2008 Mar; 33(2):169-176.
19. Summitt J, Robbins JW, Schwartz R. Funda-mental of operative dentistry. 2005. 2thed. Chi-cago: Quintessence Pub Co; Inc; 2005, 178-182.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mirzakoucheki Boroujeni P, Barekatain M, Fattahi P, Fatemi A, Zahraei L, Sharafi A et al . The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Time on Microleakage of Composite Restorations. J Islam Dent Assoc Iran. 2013; 25 (4) :272-277
URL: http://jidai.ir/article-1-1513-en.html


Volume 25, Issue 4 (10-2013) Back to browse issues page
Journal of Islamic Dental Association of Iran

AWT IMAGE

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 32 queries by YEKTAWEB 4006