[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit ::
:: Volume 26, Issue 1 (1-2014) ::
J Islam Dent Assoc Iran 2014, 26(1): 33-38 Back to browse issues page
Assessment of the Reliability and Validity of the Farsi Translation of the “Orthognathic Quality of Life Questionnaire” in 10-14 Year-Olds in Shiraz
Shahla Momeni Danaei1, Soleyman Fijan *2, Najmeh Mohammadi3, Rojin Soleimanzadeh4
1- Member of Dental Research Center and Professor, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. Shiraz, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences. Rafsanjan, Iran , fsoleiman@yahoo.com
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. Shiraz, Iran
4- Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Sanandaj University of Medical Sciences. Sanandaj, Iran
Abstract:   (8332 Views)

Background and Aim: The Orthognathic Quality of Life Questionnaire (OQLQ) was designed by Cunningham in 2001 to assess the quality of life of patients in relation to orthodontic treatments. This study sought to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Farsi version of OQLQ in 10-14 year-olds in Shiraz.

  Materials and Methods: This descriptive analytical study was conducted on 240 students in the age range of 10-14 years that were randomly selected from the 4 educational districts in shiraz. One elementary and one middle school were selected from each district. The OQLQ questionnaire contains two sections. The first section asks for demographic information of patients and the second part contains 22 questions regarding the quality of life in relation to dental status. This questionnaire was translated to Farsi using the standard forward-backward translation method. The standardized Cronbach’s alpha, alpha if item deleted, item-total correlation and inter-item coefficients were used for the assessment of the reliability and validity of the questionnaire. For the calculation of test-retest validity, 30 students filled out the questionnaire again 2 weeks after the first session. Mann Whitney U and Chi square tests were used to assess the correlation between the different aspects of the quality of life in the questionnaire and willingness to take the treatment. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 18 software .

  Results: The internal consistency analysis of the OQLQ indicated a good correlation between questions and domains of the questionnaire. Cronbach’s alpha in this study was 0.86. For the calculation oftest-retest reliability of the questionnaire, weighted kappa was found to be 0.91. Mann Whitney U and Chi square tests found significant differences between willingness for orthodontic treatment and dentofacial esthetics (part 2, P=0.008) and knowledge about dentofacial esthetics (part 4, P=0.018 ).

  Conclusion : Farsi translation of OQLQ is a suitable tool for the assessment of the effect of dentofacial problems on thequality of life of orthognathic patients in an Iranian population .

Keywords: Orthodontic status, Quality of life, Reliability, validity
Full-Text [PDF 150 kb]   (1360 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Orginal | Subject: Pediatric Dentistry
1. Becker M, Diamond R, Sainfort F. A new patient focused index for measuring quality of life in persons with severe and persistent mental illness. Quality of Life Res. 1993 Aug; 2(4):239-51.
2. Cunningham SJ, Hunt NP. Quality of life and its importance in orthodontics. J Orthod. 2001 Jun; 28 (2):152-8.
3. Inglehart M, Bagramian RA. Oral health-related quality of life. Chicago: Quintessence; 2002 Aug: 4(2):154-159.
4. Gift HC, Redford M. Oral health and the quality of life. Clin in Ger Med. 1992 Aug;8(3):673-83.
5. Bedi R, Gulati N, McGrath C. A study of satisfaction with dental services among adults in the United Kingdom. Br Dent J. 2005 Apr 9; 198 (7):433-7.
6. Shaw WC. The influence of children’s dentofacial appearance on their social attractiveness as judged by peers and lay adults. Am J Orthod. 1981 Apr;79(4):399-415.
7. Zhang M, McGrath C, Hagg U. The impact of malocclusion and its treatment on quality of life: a literature review. Int J Pediat Dent. 2006 Nov; 16 (6):381-7.
8. Albino JE, Lawrence SD, Tedesco LA. Psychological and social effects of orthodontic treatment. J Behav Med. 1994 Feb;17(1):81-98.
9. Cunningham SJ, O’Brien C. Quality of life and orthodontics. Sem in Orthod. 2007 June; 13(2):96-103.
10. Kiyak HA. Cultural and psychologic influences on treatment demand. Sem in Or-thod. 2000 Dec; 6(4):242-248.
11. Feu D, de Oliveira BH, de Oliveira Almeida MA, Kiyak HA, Miguel JA. Oral health-related quality of life and orthodontic treatment seek-ing. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Aug; 138 (2):152-9.
12. Cunningham SJ, Garratt AM, Hunt NP. Development of a condition-specific quality of life measure for patients with dentofacial de-formity: I. Reliability of the instrument. Com Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2000 Jun; 28(3):195-201.
13. Bortoluzzi MC, Manfro R, Soares IC, Presta AA. Cross-cultural adaptation of the orthog-nathic quality of life questionnaire (OQLQ) in a Brazilian sample of patients with dentofacial deformities, Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011 Aug 1; 16 (5):e694-9.
14. Al-Ahmad HT, Al-Sa’di WS, Al-Omari IK, Al-Bitar ZB. Condi¬tion-specific quality of life in Jordanian patients with dentofacial deformi-ties: A comparison of generic and disease-specific measures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Jan; 107(1):49-55.
15. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use. 2nded. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000.
16. Astrom AN, Haugejorden O, Skaret E, Trovik TA, Klock KS. Oral impacts on daily performances in norwegian adults: Validity, reliability and prevalence estimates. Europ J Oral Sci. 2005 Aug; 113(4):289-96.
17. Modig M, Andersson L, Wårdh I. Patients’ per-ception of im¬provement after orthognathic surgery: pilot study. Br J Oral Maxil¬lofac Surg, 2006 Feb; 44(1):24-7.
18. Pabari S, Moles DR, Cunningham SJ. Assessment of motivation and psychologic characteristics of adult orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Dec; 140(6):263-72.
19. Sergl HG, Zentner A. Study of psychosocial aspects of adult orthodontic treatment. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg. 1997; 12(1):17-22.
20. Kiyak HA, Hohl T, Sherrick P, West RA, McNeill RW, Bucher F. Sex differences in mo-tives for and outcomes of orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surg. 1981 Oct; 39(10):757-64.
21. Williams AC, Shah H, Sandy JR, Travess HC. Patients’ motivations for treatment and their experiences of orthodontic preparation for orthognathic surgery. J Orthod. 2005 Sept; 32(3): 191-202.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:


XML     Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Momeni Danaei S, Fijan S, Mohammadi N, Soleimanzadeh R. Assessment of the Reliability and Validity of the Farsi Translation of the “Orthognathic Quality of Life Questionnaire” in 10-14 Year-Olds in Shiraz. J Islam Dent Assoc Iran. 2014; 26 (1) :33-38
URL: http://jidai.ir/article-1-1554-en.html

Volume 26, Issue 1 (1-2014) Back to browse issues page
Journal of Islamic Dental Association of Iran


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.07 seconds with 32 queries by YEKTAWEB 3877