[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit ::
:: Volume 31, Issue 4 (10-2019) ::
J Islam Dent Assoc Iran 2019, 31(4): 203-213 Back to browse issues page
Effect of Denture Cleansing Solutions on Retention of Two Types of Overdenture Attachments
Farinaz Khodadadkashi1, Mohammad Alihemmati2, Niknaz Yahyazadehfar1, Ali Jamalighomi2, Seyed Mohammad Reza Hakimaneh2, Sayed Shojaedin Shayegh * 3
1- Postgraduate Student, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran
3- Associate Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran , shayegh13417@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (453 Views)
Background and Aim: There is lack of information regarding the effect of different denture cleansing solutions on the retention of attachments. This study aimed to as-sess the effect of denture cleansing solutions on the retention of Dalbo-Plus and Loca-tor attachment systems.
Materials and Methods: This study evaluated 160 attachments including 80 Locator and 80 Dalbo-Plus attachment systems. The attachments were mounted in acrylic resin blocks and were subjected to a universal testing machine to measure their baseline retention. Each attachment system was randomly divided into four groups for immersion in cleansing solutions namely water, 5% sodium hypochlorite diluted 1:10, Dentipur denture cleanser, and Corega denture cleanser for a period of time corresponding to 6 months of clinical service. The attachments’ retention was measured again after the immersion period. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey’s test.
Results: The retention of Dalbo-Plus attachments in water and Dentipur was significantly higher than that in other solutions (P<0.05). The Locator attachments had the highest retention in Dentipur followed by water, Corega, and sodium hypochlorite. The retention of Locator attachments was significantly higher than that of Dalbo-Plus in all solutions (P<0.05). Immersion of attachments in Dentipur in-creased their retention. Locator attachment showed higher retention than the Dalbo-Plus irrespective of the type of cleansing solution.
Conclusion: Dentipur can serve as a suitable denture cleanser since it increased the retention of attachments. Corega decreased the retention of attachments and should be used with care.
Keywords: Denture Cleansers, Denture, Overlay, Oral Hygiene
Full-Text [PDF 674 kb]   (259 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Orginal | Subject: Porosthodontics
References
1. Carr A, Brown D. McCracken's removable partial prosthodontics. 12th Ed. Mosby, 2010; chap. 1:6.
2. Zarb G, Hobkirk J, Eckert S, Jacob R. Prostho-dontic treatment for edentulous patients. 13th Ed. Mosby, 2012; chap. 1:23.
3. Heckmann SM, Heussinger S, Linke JJ, Graef F, Pröschel P. Improvement and long-term stability of neuromuscular adaptation in implant-supported overdentures. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2009 Nov; 20:1200-5.
4. Ueda T, Kremer U, Katsoulis J, Mericske-Stern R. Long-term results of mandibular implants supporting an overdenture: Implant survival, failure, and crestal bone level changes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Mar-Apr;26(2):365-72.
5. Dudic A, Merickse-Stern R. Retention mechanisms and prosthetic complications of implant supported mandibular overdentures: Long-term results. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2002;4(4):212-9.
6. McEntee MI, Walton JN, Glick N. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant retained complete overdentures: Three-year results. J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Jan;93(1):28-37.
7. Stewart BL, Edwards RO. Retention and wear of precision-type attachments. J Prosthet Dent. 1983 Jan;49(1):28-34.
8. Alsabeeha N, Atieh M, Swain MV, Payne A. At-tachment systems for mandibular singleimplant overdentures: An in vitro retention force investigation on different designs. Int J Prosthodont. 2010 Mar-Apr;23:160-6.
9. Andreiotelli M, Att W, Strub JR. Prosthodontic complications with implant overdentures: A systematic literature review. Int J Prosthodont. 2010 May-Jun;23(3):195-203.
10. Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan J. Clinical complications with implants and im-plant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Aug; 90:121-32.
11. Fromentin O, Picard B, Tavernier B. In vitro study of the retention and mechanical fatigue behavior of four implant overdenture stud-type attachments. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1999 Apr;11(3):391-7.
12. Rutkunas V, Mizutani H, Takahashi H. Influence of attachment wear on retention of mandibular overdenture. J Oral Rehabil. 2007 Jan; 34(1):41-51.
13. Budtz-Jørgensen E. Materials and methods for cleaning dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1979 Dec;42(6):619-23.
14. Mok J, Emami E, Kobayashi T, Feine J. An oral hygiene brochure for your implant overdenture patients. J Can Dent Assoc. 2007 Oct;73(8):713.
15. Rutkunas V, Mizutani H, Takahashi H. Influence of attachment wear on retention of mandibular overdenture. J Oral Rehabil. 2007 Jan;34(1):41-51.
16. Kobayashi M, Srinivasan M, Ammann P, Perriard J, Ohkubo C, Müller F, et al. Effect of in vitro cyclic dislodging on retentive force and removal torque of three overdenture attachment system. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Apr;25(4):426-34.
17. Derafshi R, Mohaghegh M, Saki M, Safari A, Haghighi MR. The effects of denture cleansing solutions on the retention of attachments of implant supported overdentures. J Dent (Shiraz). 2015 Mar;16(1 Suppl):68-72.
18. Arnold C, Fraedrich D, Setz JM, Boeckler AF. Ef-fect of cleansing solutions on the retention of Locator attachments. Int Poster J Dent Oral Med. 2011; 13(2):Poster 534.
19. Nguyen CT, Masri R, Driscoll CF, Romberg E. The effect of denture cleansing solutions on retention of pink locator attachments: An in vitro study. J Prosthodont. 2010 Apr;19(3):226-30.
20. Shayegh SS, Hakimaneh SM, Baghani MT, Shidfar S, Kashi FK, Zamanian A, et al. Effect of Interim-plant Distance and Cyclic Loading on the Reten-tion of Overdenture Attachments. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017 Nov;18(11):1078-84.
21. Tabatabaian F, Alaie F, Seyedan K. Comparison of three attachments in implant-tissue supported overdentures: an in vitro study. J Dent (Tehran). 2010 Summer; 7(3):113-8.
22. Varghese RM, Masri R, Driscoll CF, Romberg E. The effect of denture cleansing solutions on the retention of yellow Hader clips: an in vitro study. J Prosthodont. 2007 May-Jun; 16:165-171.
23. Kürkcüoğlu I, Özkir SE, Köroğlu A, Sahin O, Yil-maz B. Effect of denture cleansing solutions on different retentive attachments. J Prosthet Dent. 2016 May;115(5):606-10.
24. Watcharapichat P, Kunavisarut C, Pittayachawan P, Tengrangsan T. The effect of denture cleansing solutions on the retention of Pink Locator attachment: 1 year simulation. M Dent J. 2014 Sep-Dec;34(3):204-14.
25. Sultana N, Bartlett DW, Suleiman M. Retention of implant-supported overdentures at different implant angulations: comparing Locator and ball attachments. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Nov;28(11):1406-1410.
26. Nair Borges D, Resende L, Freitas Oliveira H, Bezzon O, Silva RF, Pagnano VO. Effect of different cleansers on the surface of removable partial denture. Braz Dent J 2011 Jun;22(5):392-7.
27. Daniela NB, Letícia R, Helena FO, Bezzon OL, Sil-va RF, Barbosa Junior F, et al. Effect of different cleansers on the weight and ion release of removable partial denture: an in vitro study. J Appl Oral Sci. 2011 Sep-Oct;19(5):483-7.
28. McGowan MJ, Shimoda LM, Woolsey GD. Effects of sodium hypochlorite on denture base metals during immersion for short-term sterilization. J Prosthet Dent. 1988 Aug; 60(2):212-8.
29. Peracini A, Regis RR, Souza RF, Pagnano VO, da Silva C, Paranhos H. Alkaline peroxides versus sodium hypochlorite for removing denture biofilm: a crossover randomized trial. Braz Dent J. 2016 Oct-Dec;27(6):700-4.
30. Arruda CN, Salles MM, Badaró MM, Oliveira V, Macedo AP, Silva-Lovato CH, et al. Effect of sodium hypochlorite and Ricinus communis solutions on control of denture biofilm: A randomized crossover clinical trial. J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Jun;117(6):729-34.
31. Salles MM, Oliveira Vde C, Souza RF, Lovato Silva CH, Paranhos H. Antimicrobial action of sodium hypochlorite and castor oil solutions for denture cleaning - in vitro evaluation. Braz Oral Res. 2015 Aug;29(1):1-6.
32. Mathai JR, Sholapurkar AA, Raghu A, Shenoy RP, Mallya HM, Pai KM, et al. Comparison of efficacy of sodium hypochlorite with sodium perborate in removal of stains from heat-cured clear acrylic resin. N Y State Dent J. 2011 Jun-Jul; 77(4):48-53.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Khodadadkashi F, Alihemmati M, Yahyazadehfar N, Jamalighomi A, Hakimaneh S M R, Shayegh S S. Effect of Denture Cleansing Solutions on Retention of Two Types of Overdenture Attachments. J Islam Dent Assoc Iran. 2019; 31 (4) :203-213
URL: http://jidai.ir/article-1-2082-en.html


Volume 31, Issue 4 (10-2019) Back to browse issues page
Journal of Islamic Dental Association of Iran

AWT IMAGE

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 30 queries by YEKTAWEB 4256