[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit ::
:: Volume 30, Issue 2 (4-2018) ::
J Islam Dent Assoc Iran 2018, 30(2): 52-57 Back to browse issues page
Effect of Implant Site Preparation by Piezoelectric and Conventional Drilling on Autograft Cell Viability: A Clinical Trial
Janet Moradi Haghgoo1, Sara Soheilifar1, Masoumeh Nikkhah2, Parviz Torkzaban3, Nazli Rabienejad * 4
1- Assistant Professor, Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Guilan, Iran
3- Associate Professor, Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
4- Assistant Professor, Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran , nazlirabi@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (559 Views)
Background and Aim: Implant site preparation with minimal trauma is an important factor in success of implant treatment and has a great effect on osseointegration. Piezoelectric bone surgery was introduced as a modern technique for micrometric osteotomy with precise, controllable action. Preservation of osteoblast cell viability is critical to achieve successful osseointegration. The present study was carried out to evaluate the effects of two implant site preparation methods on cell viability of bone particles collected during osteotomy.
Materials and Methods: In this clinical trial, 45 samples of bone chips were collected during implant site preparation by conventional drilling and 45 samples were collected by piezosurgery. Cell viability of bone chips collected by osteotomy was evaluated using MTS kit in both groups. Data were analyzed by t-test and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test via SPSS version 21 software. Results: Findings showed that the percentage of cell viability in the piezosurgery group (54.40%±7.71%) was greater than that in the conventional drilling group (29.93%±6.08%) and this difference was statistically significant (P=0.000).
Conclusion: Findings of the present study show that bone particulates collected by piezoelectric system have greater potential for longevity than those collected by conventional rotary system and can enhance bone healing around implants and result in successful osteointegration.
Keywords: Dental Implants, Cell Survival, Osteogenesis, Osseointegration, Piezosurgery
Full-Text [PDF 293 kb]   (206 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Orginal | Subject: Periodontology
1. Nikzad S, Azari A. An introduction to computer guided implantology; literature review, historical background and basicconcepts. J Dent Med. 2010 Mar;23(1):49-60.
2. Mishra SK, Chowdhary N, Chowdhary R. Dental implants in growing children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2013 May;31(1):3-9.
3. Parithimarkalaignan S, Padmanabhan TV. Osseointegration: an update. J Indian Prostho-dont Soc. 2013 Mar;13(1):2-6.
4. Ma L, Stübinger S, Liu XL, Schneider UA, Lang NP. Healing of osteotomy sites applying either piezosurgery or twoconventional saw blades: a pilot study in rabbits. Int Orthop. 2013 Aug; 37 (8):1597-603.
5. Heinemann F, Hasan I, Kunert-Keil C, Götz W, Gedrange T, Spassov A, et al. Experimental and histological investigations of the bone using two different oscillating osteotomy techniques compared with conventional rotary osteotomy. Ann Anat. 2012 Mar 20;194(2):165-70.
6. Rullo R, Addabbo F, Papaccio G, D'Aquino R, Festa VM. Piezoelectric device vs. conventional rotative instruments in impacted third molar surgery: relationships between surgical difficul-ty and postoperative pain with histological evaluations. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013 Mar; 41(2): e33-8.
7. Newman MG, Takei H, Klokkevold PR, Carranza FA. Carranza's clinical periodontolo-gy. 11th ed., Riverport lane: Sounders Elsevier Health Sciences; 2010:709-17.
8. Esteves JC, Marcantonio EJ, Souza Faloni AP, Rocha FR, Marcantonio RA, Wilk K, et al. Dynamics of bone healing after osteotomy with piezosurgery or conventional drilling - histomorphometrical, immunohistochemical, and molecular analysis. J Transl Med. 2013 Dec; 11:221.
9. Chen J, Zhang Z, Chen X, Zhang X. Influence of custom-made implant designs on the biomechanical performance for the case of immediate post-extraction placement in the maxillary esthetic zone: a finite element analy-sis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2017 May;20(6):636-644.
10. Di Stefano DA, Giacometti E, Greco GB, Gastaldi G, Gherlone E. Effect of roughened micro-threaded implant neck 
and platform switching on marginal bone loss: 
a multicenter retrospective study with 6-year fol-low-up. Quintessence Int. 2016;47(9):759-65.
11. Wei N, Bin S, Jing Z, Wei S, Yingqiong Z. In-fluence of implant surface topography on bone-regenerative potential and mechanical retention in the human maxilla and mandible. Am J Dent. 2014 Jun;27(3):171-6.
12. Chowdhary R, Jimbo R, Thomsen C, Carlsson L, Wennerberg A. Biomechanical evaluation of macro and micro designed screw-type implants: an insertion torque and removal torque study in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Mar; 24(3): 342-6.
13. Abuhussein H, Pagni G, Rebaudi A, Wang HL. The effect of thread pattern upon implant osseointegration. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Feb;21(2):129-36.
14. Misch CE. Bone density: a key determinant for treatment planning in: Misch C. Contemporary implant dentistry, 3rd ed., St. Louis, Missouri, Mosby, 2008:138.
15. Miron RJ, Gruber R, Hedbom E, Saulacic N, Zhang Y, Sculean A, et al. Impact of bone harvesting techniques on cell viability and the release of growth factors of autografts. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013 Aug;15(4):481-9.
16. Claire S, Lea SC, Walmsley AD. Characterisation of bone following ultrasonic cutting. Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Apr;17(3):905-12.
17. Gruber R, Baron M, Busenlechner D, Kandler B, Fuerst G, Watzek G. Proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of cells from cortical bone cylinders, bone particles from mill, and drilling dust. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Feb; 63(2):238-43.
18. Kuttenberger J, Polska E, Schaefer BM. A novel three-dimensional bone chip organ culture. Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Jul;17(6):1547-55.
19. Chiriac G, Herten M, Schwarz F, Rothamel D, Becker J. Autogenous bone chips: influence of a new piezoelectric device (Piezosurgery®) on chip morphology, cell viability and differentia-tion. J Clin Periodontol. 2005 Sep;32(9):994-9.
20. Berengo M, Bacci C, Sartori M, Perini A, Della Barbera M, Valente M. Histomorphomet-ric evaluation of bone grafts harvested by dif-ferent methods. Minerva Stomatol. 2006 Apr;55(4):189-98.
21. Von See C, Rücker M, Kampmann A, Kokemüller H, Bormann KH, Gellrich NC. Comparison of different harvesting methods from the flat and long bones of rats. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Dec;48(8):607-12.
22. Hsu SK, Huang WT, Liu BS, Li SM, Chen HT, Chang CJ. Effects of near-field ultrasound stimulation on new bone formation and osseointegration of dental titanium implants in vitro and in vivo. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011 Mar; 37(3):403-16.
23. Aro H, Kallioniemi H, Aho AJ, Kellokumpu- Lehtinen P. Ultrasonic device in bone cutting: A histological and scanning electron microscopical study. Acta Orthop Scand. 1981 Feb;52(1):5-10.
24. Miron RJ, Hedbom E, Saulacic N, Zhang Y, Sculean A, Bosshardt DD, et al. Osteogenic potential of autogenous bone grafts harvested with four different surgical techniques. J Dent Res. 2011 Dec;90(12):1428-33.
25. Tete S, Vinci R, Zizzari V, Cingano L, Bollero R, D'Apolito G, et al. Evaluation of effects on bone tissue of different osteotomy techniques. J Craniofac Surg. 2009 Sep;20(5):1424-9.
26. Ercoli C, Funkenbusch PD, Lee HJ, Moss ME, Graser GN. The influence of drill wear on cut-ting efficiency and heat production during oste-otomy preparation for dental implants: a study of drill durability. Int J Oral Maxillofac Im-plants. 2004 May-Jun;19(3):335-49.
27. Esposito M, Barausse C, Balercia A, Pistilli R, Ippolito DR, Felice P. Conventional drills vs piezoelectric surgery preparation for placement of four immediately loaded zygomatic oncology implants in edentulous maxillae: results from 1-year split-mouth randomized controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2017;10(2):147-158.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:


XML     Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Moradi Haghgoo J, Soheilifar S, Nikkhah M, Torkzaban P, Rabienejad N. Effect of Implant Site Preparation by Piezoelectric and Conventional Drilling on Autograft Cell Viability: A Clinical Trial. J Islam Dent Assoc Iran. 2018; 30 (2) :52-57
URL: http://jidai.ir/article-1-1958-en.html

Volume 30, Issue 2 (4-2018) Back to browse issues page
Journal of Islamic Dental Association of Iran


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.07 seconds with 31 queries by YEKTAWEB 3897