[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit ::
:: Volume 26, Issue 4 (10-2014) ::
J Islam Dent Assoc Iran 2014, 26(4): 262-266 Back to browse issues page
Retention of Fissure Sealants Used with Enamel and Dentin Bonding Agents
Hamid Moradian *1, Asiyeh Zohrei2, Bahareh Shayeghi2, Vahid Mehrabi3
1- Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. Shiraz, Iran , Moradianh206@yahoo.com
2- Post graduate Student, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. Shiraz, Iran
3- Dentist
Abstract:   (3895 Views)

Background and Aim: Tooth decay is the most common chronic disease. Fissure sealant therapy is among the suitable treatments to prevent occlusal caries. The ability of fissure sealant to prevent pit and fissure caries is due to the sealant retention. Considering the fact that several bonding agents are available in the market, clinical studies are required to assess the durability of sealants after using bonding agents. The purpose of this study was to compare the durability of fissure sealants bonded with dentin and enamel bonding agents after 12 months.

Materials and Methods: A total of 30 healthy 6 to 12 year-old patients presenting with at least one caries-free, fully erupted molar tooth at each side of their mandible were select-ed. All fissures of 60 molars were sealed using the following two techniques: Group1: acid etchant + Single Bond (3M, ESPE) dentin bonding agent +Eco-S (VERICOM) group 2: acid etchant + Margin Bond (Coltene/Whaledent AG) enamel bonding agent +Echoseal sealant. Cotton roll isolation was used in both groups. Sealants were evaluated 12 months after placement. Data were analyzed using Wilcoxon test.

Results: There was no significant difference between the two examined groups. Clinical success was 60% in group 1(dentin bonding agent) and 56.66% in group 2 (enamel bond-ing agent).

Conclusion: Although no significant difference was found between the two groups, it seems that bonding agents with hydrophilic groups show more favorable results especially when appropriate isolation is not achieved.

Keywords: Fissure sealant, Retention, Bonding
Full-Text [PDF 147 kb]   (1734 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Orginal | Subject: Pediatric Dentistry
References
1. Feigal RJ, Dony KJ. The use of pit and fissure sealants. Pediatr Dent. 2006 Mar-Apr; 28(2):143-150.
2. Makarem A, Ebrahimi M, Talebi M, Sadeghipour F. Comparison of two different bonding agents on clinical performance of fis-sure sealants. J Dent, Tehran Univ of Med Sci. 2007 Oct;4(4):149-54.
3. Burbridge L, Nugnet Z, Deery C. A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of one step conditioning agent in sealant placement: 6 month results. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2006 Nov; 16(6):424-430.
4. Simonsen R. Pit and fissure sealant: Review of the literature. Pediatr Dent. 2002 Sept-Oct; 24(5): 393-414.
5. Boksman L, Mc Connell RJ, Carson B, Mc Cutcheon-Jones EF. A 2-year clinical evaluation of two pit and fissure sealants placed with and without the use of a bonding agent. Quintes-sence Int. 1993 Feb; 24(2):131-3.
6. Pinar A, Sepet E, Aren G, Bölükbaşi N, Ulukapi H, Turan N. Clinical performance of sealants with and without bonding agents. Quintessence Int. 2005 May; 36(5):355-360.
7. Jaberi Ansari Z, Hashemi SM. Effect of enamel bonding agents on pit and fissure seal-ant retention in an isolated situation. J Dent Tehran Univ Med Sci. 2008 Jul; 5(4):156-160.
8. Das UM, G S. Bonding agents in pit and fissure sealants: a review. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2009 Sep;2(3):1-6.
9. Cehreli ZC, Gungor HC. Quantitative microleakage evaluation of fissure sealants applied with or without a bonding agent: Results after four years water storage in vitro. J Adhes Dent. 2008 Sept;10(5):379-384.
10. Pinkham JR, Casamassimo PS, Fields HW, McTigue DJ, Nowak AJ. Pediatric Dentistry: Infancy Through Adolescence. 4th ed. St. Lou-is, Mo: Elsevier Saunders; 2005, Chp 20:325-337.
11. Locker D, Jokovic A, Kay EJ. The use of pit and fissure sealants in preventing caries in permanent dentition of children. Br Dent J. 2003 Oct;195(7):375-378.
12. Feigal RJ. Sealants and preventive restorations: Review of effectiveness and clin-ical changes for improvement. Pediatr Dent. 1998 Mar-Apr; 20(2):85-92.
13. Hitt JC, Feigal RJ. Use of a bonding agent to reduce sealant sensitivity to moisture contamination: An in vitro study. Pediatr Dent. 1992 Jan-Feb; 14(1):41-46.
14. Dorantes C, Childers NK, Makhija SK, Elliot R, Chafin T, Dasanayake AP. Assessment of retention rates and clinical benefits of community sealant program. Pediatr Dent. 2005 May-Jun; 27 (3):212-216.
15. Folke BD, Walton JL, Feigal RJ. Occlusal sealant success over ten years in a privative practice, comparing longevity of sealant placed by dentist, hygienist and assistants. Pe-diatr Dent. 2004 Sep-Oct;26(5):426-432.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Moradian H, Zohrei A, Shayeghi B, Mehrabi V. Retention of Fissure Sealants Used with Enamel and Dentin Bonding Agents. J Islam Dent Assoc Iran. 2014; 26 (4) :262-266
URL: http://jidai.ir/article-1-1721-en.html


Volume 26, Issue 4 (10-2014) Back to browse issues page
Journal of Islamic Dental Association of Iran

AWT IMAGE

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.04 seconds with 30 queries by YEKTAWEB 4312